<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Cases in Higher Education Law - Higher education law</title>
<link>http://lawhighereducation.com/</link>
<language>ru</language>
<description>Cases in Higher Education Law - Higher education law</description>
<generator>DataLife Engine</generator><item>
<title>Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lawhighereducation.com/142-witters-v-washington-department-of-services-for-the-blind.html</guid>
<link>http://lawhighereducation.com/142-witters-v-washington-department-of-services-for-the-blind.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind (1986) addressed the question of whether a student’s use of state disability funds at a religious college would violate the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[Cases in Higher Education Law]]></category>
<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:43:09 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Widmar v. Vincent</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lawhighereducation.com/141-widmar-v-vincent.html</guid>
<link>http://lawhighereducation.com/141-widmar-v-vincent.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[In Widmar v. Vincent (1981), the U.S. Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a state university regulation that prohibited the use of campus facilities by religious student groups.]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[Cases in Higher Education Law]]></category>
<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:20:15 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Urofsky v. Gilmore</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lawhighereducation.com/137-urofsky-v-gilmore.html</guid>
<link>http://lawhighereducation.com/137-urofsky-v-gilmore.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[The case of Urofsky v. Gilmore (2000) involved a statute from Virginia that forbade public employees from accessing sexually explicit material on the Internet on publicly owned or leased computers, except in conjunction with bona fide research projects.]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[Cases in Higher Education Law]]></category>
<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:05:54 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lawhighereducation.com/136-university-of-pennsylvania-v-equal-employment-opportunity-commission.html</guid>
<link>http://lawhighereducation.com/136-university-of-pennsylvania-v-equal-employment-opportunity-commission.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[In University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC, 1990), the U.S. Supreme Court made it clear that university officials do not have a special legal privilege that allows them to refuse to release administratively and judicially requested materials in disputes about tenure.]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[Cases in Higher Education Law]]></category>
<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:54:03 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>United States v. Virginia</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lawhighereducation.com/135-united-states-v-virginia.html</guid>
<link>http://lawhighereducation.com/135-united-states-v-virginia.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[United States v. Virginia (1996) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case concerning the ability of state officials to maintain public single-sex institutions of higher education.]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[Cases in Higher Education Law]]></category>
<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:41:36 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lawhighereducation.com/133-trustees-of-dartmouth-college-v-woodward.html</guid>
<link>http://lawhighereducation.com/133-trustees-of-dartmouth-college-v-woodward.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819) stands out not only because it was the U.S. Supreme Court’s first case dealing with a dispute involving education but also because it provided constitutional protections for private contracts, albeit in an educational context.]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[Cases in Higher Education Law]]></category>
<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:56:55 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Tilton v. Richardson</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lawhighereducation.com/127-tilton-v-richardson.html</guid>
<link>http://lawhighereducation.com/127-tilton-v-richardson.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Tilton v. Richardson is a landmark 1971 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court upholding a congressional grant program that made federal funds available to private religious colleges for constructing buildings.]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[Cases in Higher Education Law]]></category>
<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:21:18 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Sweezy v. New Hampshire</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lawhighereducation.com/124-sweezy-v-new-hampshire.html</guid>
<link>http://lawhighereducation.com/124-sweezy-v-new-hampshire.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[At issue in Sweezy v. New Hampshire (1957) was whether a state investigation of alleged subversive activities deprived a speaker at a university of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment.]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[Cases in Higher Education Law]]></category>
<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:30:06 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Sweatt v. Painter</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lawhighereducation.com/123-sweatt-v-painter.html</guid>
<link>http://lawhighereducation.com/123-sweatt-v-painter.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[In Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka (1954), the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the “separate but equal” doctrine that it had articulated in the late 19th century in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[Cases in Higher Education Law]]></category>
<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:06:53 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Southeastern Community College v. Davis</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lawhighereducation.com/115-southeastern-community-college-v-davis.html</guid>
<link>http://lawhighereducation.com/115-southeastern-community-college-v-davis.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[In Southeastern Community College v. Davis (1979), the U.S. Supreme Court reviewed Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504) for the first time.]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[Cases in Higher Education Law]]></category>
<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:10:47 -0600</pubDate>
</item></channel></rss>